![]() * Performance wise in terms of climb rate and acceleration, the 5.0 focke wulfs are actually a bit worse than the 3.3 focke wulf * Performance wise in terms of max speed, there is very little difference between a 3.3 focke wulf and a 5.0 focke wulf. Performance of Fw-190's according to forum datasheet: Their performance is so much worse that once they cant force head on, they might as well hold J becuase all they can just is spam their roll rate and dive but in the end they just delay the certain death. Just avoid the head on and then easy clap spank them till they die. Optimal Altitude (at reasonable combat alt)į4U-4: 16.22m/s (100%) Įspecially the Fw-190A-5 and Fw-190A-8 are just like children with guns. ![]() And I've never had any issues with the A-5 or A-8, both felt fine at their BR. Well I've flown 2.7 Corsair and at it's worse than the A-5. Infact 665km/h was the most common combat max speed of D-9’s Infact this is the real performance of the captured soviet Fw-190D-9 which currently runs on settings that Germany used very late war and at the time soviet captured one didn’t have. What I think the FW-190 line should look like BR wise and what could be added.įw-190D-2 doesn’t really differ at all to D-9 which means it can use the initial early D-9 performance running at lower ATA. All it takes is a smart player to simply avoid a head on with you and then your 190 is completely outclassed. This is what leads to BF-109 spam and only few 190’s. At their respective BR’s the BF-109’s not only have better max speed, but much better turn rate and climb.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |